<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The art of compliance and AJAX powered sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chansiulun.com/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chansiulun.com/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/</link>
	<description>Quite frankly...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 15:11:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: skyro</title>
		<link>http://chansiulun.com/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>skyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citisky.net/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Yes, they offer a text only version of website which works just fine but could still use some improvement with &#124; (vertical bars) I noticed in the title, but the graphical version is horrific to use in screen readers

But my point here being no one should be penalised for the equipment they use and instead of offering a text-only version of sites as a link. It should by default shows a page that is visually pleasing but also pleasing to those with disabilities. 

To see this in a different viewpoint and to elaborate a bit more, it is like, I suppose how airlines call their seats &quot;economy/value&quot; class but they&#039;re starting to change that to &quot;Hospitality&quot; class as they&#039;ve finally realised the word &quot;economy&quot; means cheap, if you catch what I&#039;m trying to say. In the context of websites, it makes the user to the site feel unwelcomed or perhaps a minor discriminated against.

Of course offering a site like that is not only because of accessiblity but also, allows people with slower hardware and/or connection to view the site with the least stress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they offer a text only version of website which works just fine but could still use some improvement with | (vertical bars) I noticed in the title, but the graphical version is horrific to use in screen readers</p>
<p>But my point here being no one should be penalised for the equipment they use and instead of offering a text-only version of sites as a link. It should by default shows a page that is visually pleasing but also pleasing to those with disabilities. </p>
<p>To see this in a different viewpoint and to elaborate a bit more, it is like, I suppose how airlines call their seats &#8220;economy/value&#8221; class but they&#8217;re starting to change that to &#8220;Hospitality&#8221; class as they&#8217;ve finally realised the word &#8220;economy&#8221; means cheap, if you catch what I&#8217;m trying to say. In the context of websites, it makes the user to the site feel unwelcomed or perhaps a minor discriminated against.</p>
<p>Of course offering a site like that is not only because of accessiblity but also, allows people with slower hardware and/or connection to view the site with the least stress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://chansiulun.com/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 19:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citisky.net/2006/08/08/the-art-of-compliance-and-ajax-powered-sites/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Have you tried their features with a screenreader? They seem to work just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried their features with a screenreader? They seem to work just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
